Opinions are divided on whether money should be invested in faster means of public transport or whether the government should spend it on other urgencies. Both sides of this argument will be discussed in the essay below before my view on this matter is drawn in the end.
I understand why some people believe that the faster means of public transport need to be invested in. From their point of view, when public transport is upgraded to be faster it can help ease traffic congestion. In fact, with speedy means of public transport will encourage a reduction in the use of private vehicles. Another point to be made is that people can achieve the time efficiency. Instead of spending much time on commuting, people can take advantage of that time to get unfinished tasks done at the beginning of a day. As a result, they can reduce daily workload.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why the government should spend money on other priorities. Firstly, the economic zones are becoming more popular which means various factories are built without proper waste treatment systems, which leads to exhaust fumes and polluted water. So the government should support to build standard waste treatment factories to restrict the amount of emission released to protect the health of residents. Secondly, lack of medical centers in remote areas which means that people have to travel far distance to get there. The government should consider to build more medical centers at necessary places, which are opened 24 hours a day, have modern facilities and well-trained staff. This will help people receive timely treatment and ensure their health.
In conclusion, I would side with those who believe that the government should spend money on other priorities such as the environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05084745763 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53314937064 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545762711864 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.496940511 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379221085258 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122511968976 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123510292755 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244950031986 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779669450702 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.