Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people hold the opinion that it is more worthy to invest time and expenditure in mankind rather than using them for wild animals’ conservation. I somewhat agree with this viewpoint because spending on human beings is vitally important but protecting animals is also necessary.
Time and financial resources should be better allocated to the human race for a combination of reasons. First and foremost, there are still the needy such as disadvantaged or homeless people who are struggling to survive owing to their poor financial health. To illustrate, it is obvious that many individuals all over the world have strapped for cash and even can not cover their basic needs like food or clothes. Especially in such a pandemic period, society has witnessed an ever-increasing number of unemployed, and it is difficult to find just temporary jobs to get by. They, therefore, really need time and financial support from the community to overcome their problems and improve living standards. Furthermore, as education acts as a key determiner in socio-economic development, more time and budgets need to be spent on educational activities, which would, in turn, paves the way for creating a civilized and thriving society.
On the other hand, people should also spend time and funding on animal-related projects moderately. The main supporting reason is that if wild animals are not protected, the ecological balance may be destroyed, which leads to a vast of disastrous repercussions for humans. It is exemplified by the extinction of several kinds of fauna causing the break of the food chain that has negative impacts on human lives. Another compelling reason is that animals are living side by side with us for a long time, and they are considered our friends. Hence, our lives would be much less meaningful and interesting in the absence of them.
To sum up, although the human race takes precedence over the fauna in terms of being concerned, we still need to spend a suitable amount of time and money on the conservation of animals, particularly those which are endangered.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11730205279 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95568296361 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.605619396 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.642857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218738919889 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666699398696 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517209829503 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134085489179 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470763241943 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.