Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers, people lose the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the enormous influence of modern technology, many people have started to approach the Internet by technical devices. However, this situation was done at a high-frequency day by day, caused the capability of communicating directly more difficult, which I wholeheartedly agree with. In this essay, I will show two reasons why.
First of all, people nowadays often rapidly draw to interesting and eye-catching advertisements or social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter… From that point, they can easily be addicted to those entertaining platforms. This led to more and more individuals not paying attention to their real lives and lacking communication. For example, in a community, we can find plenty of people all glued to the screen instead of sharing or talking together even though they are close to each other.
Secondly, a significant number of people can be seen that depends too much on mobile phones, computers, and social platforms. This is mainly because they feel more comfortable and confident when using virtual apps, which do not need eye contact with their partner. Besides, they can express everything they think without hesitation. Therefore, when they meet each other in person, they would promptly get shy then cannot communicate naturally. For instance, students these days often feel embarrassed and awkward while making a real conversation directly. Therefore, avoiding talking as much as possible is the best choice for them because of getting used to chatting on social media.
In conclusion, people are losing their potential to communicate eye-to-eye since they are quickly obsessed with mobile phones and computers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to eye'?
Suggestion: to eye
...n using virtual apps, which do not need eye contact with their partner. Besides, th...
^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essed with mobile phones and computers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43629343629 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94744088334 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679536679537 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7802473631 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.307692308 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151546290409 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050694317288 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513827578464 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107043132449 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566294100663 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.