Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers, people lose the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the growth of the COVID-19 pandemic leads to the rise of mobile phone and computer consumption. As a result, some people's belief that humans are losing the ability to communicate face to face due to this increase. I concur with this statement up to some point.
Firstly, the main reason why people lose their communication skills in social media. Social media sites are replacing regular socialization with unlimited distance, no delay, and multitasking abilities. All these functions can easily be found on Facebook, Instagram, Zalo and Messenger. Thus, many people prefer to use social media without any defence from its harmful sites, which are the lack of body language and monotone in words lead to the following reason. Secondly, people will become afraid to communicate in a new way and gradually lose this ability. As I mentioned before, with the lack of body language and the monotone, the teenagers and children will not read body language and are even afraid of strangers. When the fear grows with age, they lose the ability to communicate face to face.
But, let's look at the bright side of the problem. Factually, phones and computers are not just social media. If people can make use of it wisely, it can broaden anyone's horizon with some clicks. Moreover, if the government can raise awareness about harmful social sites and impose stricter punishment, the problem is almost solved. Finally, the development of social networks is integral. Therefore, humanity has to deal with this problem, not eliminate it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...omputers consumption. As a result, some peoples belief that humans are losing the abili...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pristine way" with adverb for "pristine"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eople will become afraid to communicate in a pristine way and gradually lose this ability. As I m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10188679245 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66062089077 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6938125877 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306829616886 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109347912239 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995624936944 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222929991493 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841940597349 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.