Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that adapting to climate change is better than preventing it. However, I believe that we should prevent climate change because it could threaten the nature inevitably and extinct wild animals.
The ever-increasing problem of climate change could give an inevitable impact to nature, if it is not handled seriously, so prevention action to such phenomenon is crucial. As environmental issue links to each other environment, a problem in one site of nature might extend to another site of it, making uncontrolled natural disasters. For instance, NASA scientists reported that the preserve melting of west antartic ice sheet is 30% faster in the recent decade following rising temperature in global. Thus, this should persistently be prevented, for it would enlarge ice sheet collapse, and the ice sheet would send sea levels rising 16 feet more.
Further problem when climate change affects the environment is wildlife extinction. That is because some wild animals are sensitive to changes in temperature and environment, so such climate can devastate their habitat, source of food, and their breeding and feeding patterns. A net example is how cheetah population is facing a speedy decline over a decade. According to International Nature Conservation (INC), drought years in some cheetah habitats caused by global warming had decreased cheetah’s ability to reproduce, lowering their testosteron level. By this, a mass extinction might occur in wildlife in the future.
In conclusion, while many people attempt to live with climate change, others argue to tackle it with prevention. I stand with the latter group since it is dangerous for nature and wild animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reaten the nature inevitably and extinct wild animals. The ever-increasing pro...
^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e change, others argue to tackle it with prevention. I stand with the latter grou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40909090909 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8713120635 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.453533071 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164956563977 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610821878842 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637216652527 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116832730739 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643499663565 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.