Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however,
others think there are some other ways.
While international car-free days are thought to effectively reduce the level of air pollution, some other
people believe there are alternatives that are also effective. I will discuss both of these views in my
essay below.
On the one hand, it is true that exhaust fumes from cars are majorly responsible for polluting the air as
they contain a relatively high proportion of pollutants such as CO2. By having some days without cars on
the road, no harmful smoke will be released into the atmosphere, and this will therefore improve air
quality. This policy is extremely effective in big cities around the world. Take Beijing, the city known for
its dirty air and its atmosphere covered with smog, for example. Since this car-free policy was strictly
operated, the air quality of the city has greatly improved.
On the other hand, local governments should encourage the use of public tranport like subways because
it produces a smaller quantity of pollutants and is less likely to damage the air. Also, the disposal of
waste, especially plastic waste that emits toxic fumes if burned carelessly, at landfills should be closely
monitored. The final and the most effective way is to use sustainable and environmentally energy
sources, for example solar or wind power, to replace fossil fuels in the long term.
In my view, those measures are all effective in addressing the problem of air pollution, but only to a
certain extent. Such a problem needs to be dealt with by different approaches and I always feel that if
there is only one way being implemented, it will not be enough
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02247191011 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68960278927 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8498473381 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.38176352705 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234642306857 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815724428798 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110787545786 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733623536069 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111536252903 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.