The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and
international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates average yearly expenditure of consumers on three selected types of services, namely cell phone, national and international fixed line services over a period of 9 years, starting from 2001.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the expenditure on mobile phone, while the opposite was true for that of national fixed line services during the period. It is also noticeable that the amount of money spent on international fixed line remain stable over the period shown.
In 2001, roughly 700$ was spent on national fixed line services, in comparison with the figure for mobile phone services, at about 200$. In the next five years, the expense of cell phone increased to approximately 500$, whereas the expenditure on national fixed line experienced a fall of 200$ to 500$. At the end of the period, the amount of money for cell phone reached a peak at around 750$. Meanwhile, only 400$ was spent on national fixed line in 2010.
Starting at roughly 250$ during the first year of the period, the expenditure on international fixed line services fluctuated at around 300$ three years later. For the rest of the period, its figure remained unchanged, at about 300$, which was the lowest among three types of services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...ver the period shown. In 2001, roughly 700$ was spent on national fixed line servic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...ure for mobile phone services, at about 200$. In the next five years, the expense of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...f cell phone increased to approximately 500$, whereas the expenditure on national fi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...tional fixed line experienced a fall of 200$ to 500$. At the end of the period, the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...ixed line experienced a fall of 200$ to 500$. At the end of the period, the amount o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$750'.
Suggestion: $750
...for cell phone reached a peak at around 750$. Meanwhile, only 400$ was spent on nati...
^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$400'.
Suggestion: $400
... a peak at around 750$. Meanwhile, only 400$ was spent on national fixed line in 201...
^^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
...ixed line in 2010. Starting at roughly 250$ during the first year of the period, th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...ixed line services fluctuated at around 300$ three years later. For the rest of the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...its figure remained unchanged, at about 300$, which was the lowest among three types...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98557692308 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60954080586 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495192307692 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2640144045 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296112836141 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14413662403 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994525750941 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214158803019 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108464226969 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.