Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent decades, it has been seen that the advancement in technology has not only provided luxuries but also given birth to several problems. Today, the deterioration of air is an alarming issue globally. While some people are of the opinion that a day when cars are prohibited is a workable measure to alleviate this contamination, but this problem needs large scale and long-term measures to be taken.
On the one hand, there is a common belief that a car-free day can reduce air-pollution severity. Firstly, carbon emission from exhausted fumes may be significantly cut off, for cars are not allowed to be used on that day. To enumerate, cars are the major contributor in traffic and thus major contributor in air pollution as well. Avoiding cars can successfully reduce the air contamination at least for one day. Secondly, avoiding the use of car on that day leaves no resort other than means of transport such as walking, bus or subway, and therefore, the rewarding experiences help them be aware of the convenience and mobility of other commuting methods in comparison with cars. Consequently, the environment friendly transports can become their preferred choice.
On the other hand, abandoning cars for a day is not sustainable enough to address severe air contamination. In other words, only applying car-free rules for one day decreases the greenhouse gas emissions very minimally. Instead, government should impose higher taxes on cars, like it has been implementing in many developing countries. Only after this policy is applied only fewer people can afford cars, and eventually car density on roads fall with the decline of its emissions. Furthermore, other developed nations should invest in energy-efficient engines so that commuters can still benefit from the safety and comfort of cars and the quantity of pollutants in the atmosphere is controlled. For example, electric cars can be a feasible alternative for petroleum ones for eco-friendly purposes.
In conclusion, the program that encourages motorists to give up their cars for one day is a good idea to deal with air pollution, but government need to simultaneously take other measures such as increase in car price and advancements of car engines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | Dikshaa_007 | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-11 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-11 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
- you want to volunteer to help the old people of your community An organization in your area works for the benefit of old people Write a letter to the in charge of that organization explaining Why do you want to help How can you help them When will you ava 88
- In most of the countries number of plants and animal species are declining What is causing this What can we do to change the situation 86
- Some teachers think that a program of international exchange visits would benefit all teenage school students Do you think the benefits of such a program would outweigh any disadvantages 84
- You are going to arrange a celebration You want to invite a singer Write a letter to him tell him about the event invite him to perform at the event explain why you want him to perform 70
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21388888889 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06139719373 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580555555556 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7897030746 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.3125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.625 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227469953905 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769194479905 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561290637435 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143507924829 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019782854604 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.