Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, air pollution has gained a great deal of attention around the world. The issue has become a bone of contention among the critics regarding the way of reducing it. While some people consider observing the international car-free day will be beneficial for curbing the air pollution, however, I would contend that there are lots of other methods for doing it which are more result-driven.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that observation of international car-free day will be a part of great level of awareness. For this reason, people will be engaged in discussing the critical environmental issues and they will understand how petrol-based vehicles are impacting the quality of air we are inhaling every day. Furthermore, while observing the day globally, it can save a huge amount of fossil fuels. Thus, it can develop the sense among the vehicle owners that our resources are limited. Most importantly, it will stop the emission of carbon-dioxide and dangerous lead particles in the air. Hence, the extent of air pollution will be reduced and overall awareness will be raised globally.
Conversely, rather than observing just a single awareness day in a year, there is a numerous result-oriented approach to limit the air pollution. For instance, it can be done by replacing the fossil-fuel based vehicles into electric or solar-power based cars, which is already being encouraged in developed countries including Canada and the USA. In addition, factories and heavy industries must be compelled by the governmental bodies to follow the Environment Protection Act. Thus, they will treat the toxic smokes properly before expelling it to the environment and the purity of the air will be improved. On top of that, tree plantation must be taken into consideration to handle the existing load of carbon-dioxide from the environment. Therefore, the air will be free from the obnoxious level of toxic pollutants and we will be able to breathe a healthy air.
All things considered, we are almost on the brink of irreversible damage to our mother nature due to air pollution. I personally believe, there are a lot of things to do to redress the balance rather than observing the awareness issues alone.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, hence, however, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11538461538 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02713346459 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1065190707 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.529411765 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144653663964 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478044854469 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054578101692 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102029959259 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734292975689 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.