Some people think that international collaboration is necessary to solve the problem of terrorism. To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement?
In the world of today, terrorism attacks are clearly something that is often discuss in today's world, However, some group of people believe that entire countries join and create organization and fight together to destroy issue of terrorism. I support to this statement to a large extend for some reasons. My position is argued further with explanation.
To embark on, there are several benefits to involve with other countries. First and foremost, group of nations is capable to decline and demolish this phenomenon. I mean that, nations are not enough capable to fight with terrorist therefore, they always face some trouble situation in nation. In addition to this, some developing countries receive global support such as tool of fight, financial aid and many more. For this reason, they should encourage their soldier to fight with latest equipment without any hesitation. For a real-life example, the India receive some fighter plan from the Russia to fight against terrorism.
In contrast, I would not overlook the other side too. To begin with, some nations think about their own benefits therefore, they avoid contributing in international collaboration. sometimes, several nations cannot believe in international merging because trust play in important role in contribution. these days, nation should get support from terrorists for some reasons that is why, it is important to think about negative results before worldwide collaboration.
By the way of conclusion, I would argue that it is beneficial for nations to consider about international collaboration because of several reasons but, they must think about issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...should encourage their soldier to fight with latest equipment without any hesitation. For a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sometimes
...ibuting in international collaboration. sometimes, several nations cannot believe in inte...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...play in important role in contribution. these days, nation should get support from te...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, as to, i mean, in addition, in contrast, such as, by the way, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45275590551 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84178071839 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594488188976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9624211292 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155597732407 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536734903938 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367869936716 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985142446978 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210612939265 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.