It is believed that a horizontal city is the best place to live in, but opponents of this idea prefer to resident in a vertical city. In my opinion, I consider that living in a vertical city is much better.
On the one hand, there are benefits to residents who dwell in a city which consists of low-rise construction. One reason is that if they settle in a private house, they may save a great deal of money since they do not have to spend money on building service fees. Other reason is that living lower to the ground is safer for inhabitants when emergencies occur. For example, if a fire start in a home, they can quickly escape from the dangerous area, this is due to the building is not much high off the ground and it won’t take much time to leave.
On other one hand, it seems to me that choosing high-rise buildings to live is the best choice. Firstly, a city with skyscrapers could have more space for public usage such as hospital and school. This may lead to an improvement in the quality of life of the whole community. Secondly, it is undeniable that a vertical city is convenient for residents to live in an apartment in a tall building which offers a range of goods and services, thanks to shopping malls and service centers on lower floors.
In conclusion, while a horizontal city has some benefits but I agree that the advantage of life in a vertical city is outweighed than a horizontal city.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49230769231 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58398572916 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0264027713 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2172192233 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917013442157 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918604664562 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172903209892 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104546120067 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.