Some people think that it is more benefit to take part in sports which are played by a team, like football, while other think that taking part in individual sport, like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
It is undeniable that sports bring a variety of benefits to people. While many people suppose that playing individual games is the best way to gain advantages, I would argue that joining in a team is much better.
On the one hand, there are double of reasons to choose one-person sports. Firstly, individual games give athletes an easier access to sharpen their independence. Indeed, sportmen playing tennis or badminton learn to manage and allocate their energy as well as wholly concentration on the matches. As a result, whether players become the champions of the competitions or not, they master some soft skills such as time-management or resource allocation which are necessary for their later life. Additionally, requiring smaller space to practices is another bright sight of individual games. It is irrefutable that, the less athletes participate in a game, the less space needed. For example, hardly can a football or basketball match be hold in a narrow location, but individual games like badminton or billiard is more practicable.
On the other hand, I believe that being a part of a team to play sport is more beneficial in some ways. In the first place, players are created a favorable condition to build a strong co-operation as well as relationship with other team members. Joining in a team, not only are each teammate ‘s strengths developed but their deficiencies are addressed by others. Besides, team-members also learn to manage conflict to harmonize their friendship. Secondly, joining to a club, to some extents, athletes are more successful in branding their images and multiple their income. Let ‘s take Real Madrid football club as a telling instance, had it not been for the reputation of this club, Ronaldo - a football player in this team, would have never become famous to the peak of wining FIFA golden ball like that.
In conclusion, although both individual or team sports have their own pros, I am more falling to the latter one on the ground of it highlighted benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-07 | Dongz Nguyen | 84 | view |
- Sicentific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or dissagree? 89
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 78
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their every day life. What are their problems? Should government encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun athletes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...dual games. It is irrefutable that, the less athletes participate in a game, the les...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08708708709 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86716941869 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588588588589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6624492723 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231041233859 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677368407592 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653498421086 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13907523239 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351076697205 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.