Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on
promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
In this day and age, the growing number of diseases have been posing a huge threat to human well-being. It is believed that authorities should spend the national budget on improving a healthy lifestyle to so that mitigating forthcoming health problems, while others think that should use this money to cure patients. From my perspective, I lean towards the former mindset due to several compelling reasons.
Admittedly, despite the fact that cutting-edge technology has been developing these days, some chronic diseases have not been cured. Take Cancer as an example, not only do patients pay a huge of money to save their life but also doctors encounter adversity in finding methods to cure their patients. However, hardly any cancer patients can suffer from these health problems. It is an undeniable truth that detrimental habits such as drinking alcohol or smoking have been the major causes that breed tremendous health diseases. Therefore, governments should deter this trend by advertising the harmful of bad habits.
Furthermore, living a healthy life does a favor for humans thus it is necessary for the government to allocate state funding to promote this lifestyle. To begin with, eating a clean diet and doing physical exercise have been strengthening human well-being, resulting in people having full of resistance to some tiny illness. To be more specific, should a person not have sufficient strength, they will easily be infected with flu or ill. Therefore, governments should take action to raise their dwellers’ awareness by updating information about how to lead a healthy life by utilizing social platforms such as Facebook or billboards. Besides, it is the case that living a healthy life means fewer residents visiting hospitals, resulting in a decrease in the amount of national money demanded for hospitalization or other medical fees, alleviating the government’s burden of taking care of patients.
To conclude, I wholly believed that the expenditures of the state budget should center on illness prevention by raising public awareness of regular exercise and healthy eating habits rather than curing terminal illnesses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39644970414 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89019790569 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1150929364 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169620952551 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483165208155 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426508921891 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096582322539 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437461492383 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.