Currently, public health campaigns are becoming more popular among adults who were between 20 and 54 years old. It is argued that it is more crucial to provide expenditure on developing healthier lifestyles for preventing sickness rather than spending on treating ill patients. From my point of view, my disagreement shows through how supportive I am to the idea of many people who are sick should be specifically focusing on.
On one hand, equality makes a huge impact where everyone needs to be treated the same. This could be explained by the fact that when people are badly treating will raise questions in society such as the effectiveness of government in improving public health. Some cities in Indonesia had tried using more money on other solutions, which leads to the madness of patient relatives where hospitals were of low quality and disturbing the journeys of fighting illness.
On the other hand, whenever comes to providing an environment for the sickness community, people tend to agree with this solution most of the time. Because of the improvement in material facilities and more professional doctors being invited to teach without taking money from people living under the poverty line, society would be able to welcome people healthily rejoin to work, happily living their lives again. In the best treatment countries such as Canada or Cuba, the percentage of people safely living without worrying about illness are in expect, higher than the neighboring countries, because they put cost and time to give people chances to improve both their mental and physical health.
In conclusion, I believe that the government should pay more attention the sick patients rather than pay money for social campaigns which are not 100% effective all the time. A caring environment decides a lot on how someone weak feels much better just mentally. The world would change the way they look at these solutions when they stand from the other side of the view to have a clearer look.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sagreement shows through how supportive i am to the idea of many people who are s...
^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...Indonesia had tried using more money on others solution, which leads to the madness of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06130268199 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52910133197 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659003831418 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2701439157 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.777777778 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240716181503 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883692348625 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619487971916 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148845150175 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566966904746 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.