Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The expenditure of an enormous amount of finances on advancing technologies for the purposes of discovering heavenly bodies upon the sky has for a long time become a matter of controversies. Then, several people these days find no justification for investing in space exploration since they believe money should be used in a more advantageous way. From my perspective, while it is undeniable that the financial investment in exploring planets can beneficial human civilisation, there are some other fields that also worth spending the money on
To initiate, there is a variety of explanation to support the idea of investing money on exploring the sky. One fundamental reason is that it may allow human beings to find the second shelter in time to come. It does not seem unreasonable to conclude that natural resources on Earth are not unlimited and, hence, people will soon experience the depletion somedays. Consequently, the space exploration for the possibilities of life in outer space is spectacularly important for not only one single generation but also for the posterity. By the way of exemplifying, several projects for the migration of human to different spheres within the solar system are on the docket but can only be turned into reality with sufficient monetary aid.
Nevertheless, there are various other areas that required the money more than conducting research and experiments on distinct planets.
There seems to be evidence that numerous people throughout the world are suffering from global undernourishment, the abrupt modification of temperature, environmental degradation and severe transmitted diseases. Finding an efficient solution for those existing problems is allegedly more urgent since its consequence is more recognizable. By the way of exemplifying, finding an alternative for fossil fuels is probably more realistic compared with migrating to other worlds
In conclusion, exploring the space, which is synonymous with finding the second Earth for human beings, is irrefutably beneficial for people. However, investing this money on different and more urgent field is obviously more realistic and important for our survival
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch and experiments on distinct planets. There seems to be evidence that numerous...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, while, as for, in conclusion, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51651651652 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17792358269 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570570570571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9386260177 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.083333333 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283132804748 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995241375353 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675572566322 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163238939897 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674535987499 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.