Some people think that money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justifiable. They believe there are more beneficial ways of spending this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the fast pace of technology proliferation, the question of whether or not money should be spent to explore the universe has become a controversial topic. Although space exploration might be beneficial to humans in the long run, I believe that there are some aspects worth being funded than this.
To begin with, it is a fallacy to consider that the long-term survival of the human race depends on the ability to move off the Earth. In other words, due to today context of development with the unprecedented population growth, an increasing amount carbon emissions and waste have been discharged every day, which consequently leads to the formation of a harsh environment making humans unable to inhabit. Thereby, the public sector should use the governmental budget to seek for living conditions in other planets. However, such a scenario is exaggerated because the habitat on Earth would take million years to be completely destroyed. Furthermore, if space exploration is carried out by the private sector, they will be more properly funded and more likely to reach a groundbreaking achievement. Thus, the governmental bodies should allocate money to improve living standard of inhabitants.
Since space exploration necessitates huge monetary resources to develop, taxpayers would be more satisfied if their money is spent on healthcare and education, which would be directly conducive to their lives. This is because space exploration merely provides solutions for long-term problems, while there are also more urgent fields that are also in need of financial support such as subsidies for the unemployees. For example, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, people in various part of the world, especially those in developing countries, are suffering from job loss and famine. Therefore, more money should be allocated to assist underprivileged people rather than space exploration.
In conclusion, despite the benefits associated with space exploration, the government should consider the welfare of citizens as its top priority. Additionally, I believe that conglomerates such as Space-X bear a responsibility to study the cosmo.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-15 | layla23012003 | 89 | view |
- Cycling is the healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transportation Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this What can be done to make cycling more popular 84
- Some people think that money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justifiable They believe there are more beneficial ways of spending this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 84
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 84
- For many employers formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience Why is that Is it a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... fast pace of technology proliferation, the question of whether or not money should be spent to explore...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...because the habitat on Earth would take million years to be completely destroyed. Furth...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49696969697 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09036834248 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7747691928 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25108144636 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800364073774 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056979486961 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148007885056 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736259311193 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.