In the current time of technological advancement; one of the most pressing concerns regarding the given topic asserts that whether the museums and art gallaries should only focus on its native art or culture; instead of exposing the foreign art? I am completely disagree with this statement and shall explore the dimensions of this topic and shape up my opinion by the end.
To begin with, Museums and Art gallaries play the vital role in the prevention of historical memories. Moreover, these are the best source of enjoyment for the people as they come to obtain knowledge about their traditional customs and cultural values. However, it is also important for them to be acknowledged about the foreign art and craft. Furthermore, they already know their domestic culture therefore, once they see the portraits, paintings and historical equipments of overseas countries, they would gather the wider information about the other countries. For instance, India is a country, where 53% museums and art gallaries not only show its native art but also reveal the foreign art to the public.
Apart from that, Showing foreign art and culture in the museums and art gallaries have also been crucial for those who never got a chance to go abroad therefore, it would be fruitful for them to learn about foreign culture rather than to explore on internet or various sites as they can see everything about foreign culture from the museums and art gallaries. One best epitome of this is that, people who want to make any of the art can gain idea from the foreign abstracts which would be useful for them.
As we have seen number of answers to this question however, I tend to believe that museums and art gallaries should encouage the art of other countries without avoiding its domestic arts and crafts because it has various benefits for the people in terms of learning foreign customs and traditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...posing the foreign art? I am completely disagree with this statement and shall explore t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...from the museums and art gallaries. One best epitome of this is that, people who want to mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93730407524 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55588378775 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529780564263 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.4225088469 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295071679932 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132839642383 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681215479651 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207837599362 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371406277873 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.