Unemployment is a major sin in which the person remain left behind from having job or any source of earning. In the current time of technological advancement, one of the most pressing concerns regarding the given topic is that either it would be fruitful for the people to have job; seeking the help from mobile phones given by the government? I am completely agreed with this statement and shall explore the dimensions of this topic and shape up my opinion by the end.
To begin with, half of the total population is unemployed in the country like India. They do not have any way to get job. The reason behind this is that, there are not enough sources of employment because India os at the developing stage. Therefore, government should carefully think about this serious aspect. It should help the people who are leading a poor life and do not have any source of earning so in this regards, government should have to provide mobile phones to those people who has been suffering from unemployment. Moreover, it would be great advantage for them if they would make use of mobile phones for finding the job. Furthermore, they can easily find the way to have a particular job with the help of it. The best epitome of this is that, people who are below the poverty line, those who do not have enough money even to survive then how they would buy a phone on their own? Therefore, mobile phones must be provided by the government to them.
Apart from them, internet plays a greatest role in trading or doing a particular job online. In this modern era, most of the people are taking advantage of the internet so government should provide faculty of free internet usage along with the mobile phones. In addition to this, unemployed ones could do any online business as well as they could gain more knowledge regarding a particular field in which they want to go. Furthermore, with the aid of internet, they would not have any need to pay for the tutor and experts for having knowledge about something. They can easily access to the internet as it would enhance their knowledge. For instance, a survey was conducted by a marketing company, it revealed the information that 48% of people are earning through the internet by online business so the people who find any difficulty to have job, they can turn their mind towards this side.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that government should not provide mobile phones and free access to internet to each and every person. It should have to provide only to needy people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...ould be fruitful for the people to have job; seeking the help from mobile phones gi...
^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...do not have any source of earning so in this regards, government should have to prov...
^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... them. Apart from them, internet plays a greatest role in trading or doing a par...
^
Line 5, column 843, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
... people who find any difficulty to have job, they can turn their mind towards this ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67945823928 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49177215113 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476297968397 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0478619427 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.65 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.15 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35674976844 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115725908883 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649636058134 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233557320142 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747729783811 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.