Money plays a greatest role in everyone's life; without it nobody could survive in this world. One of the most pressing concerns regarding the topic is that either having fulfilled all the basic necesseties; a affluent person has to donate rest of the money to poorer people or not? I am completely disagree with this statement and shall explore the dimensions of this topic by shape up my opinion at the end.
To begin with, it is not bad to help a needy person with the money. However, giving rest of the money to someone probably be not
possible because everyone is earning for his better life. They are not earning only to fulfill their basic needs: food, shelter and cloth but also wanted to lead a royal life. Moreover, it could not be possible if, someone has not enough money. Furthermore, people who are earning above from the limit; always have a desire to save some money for their future generation. The best epitome of this is that, desire to earn more and more has always remains in the mind of the person, if a person got a ferrari, he would be wanted to have a more expensive car than ferrari later on. Therefore, this perception do not allow their mind to donate their own earning.
Apart from that, it is the general responsibility of the government to help the people who are below the poverty line. Moreover, wealthy people are already paying the heavy amount of tax and government collect this tax for the welfare of people. In spite of this, it would be as difficult as to touch the stars from the sky because nobody cannot fulfill the needs of each and every person who are suffering from poverty. For instance, in the country like India, 60% people are facing poverty therefore, government should utilize the taxes by opening some welfare institutions for the needy people.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that the balance between poorer and richer could only be possible with the collide efforts of both government and wealthy individuals. They should pay tax by honestly on proper time to government so it could circulated by the government among the public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
Money plays a greatest role in everyones life; withou...
^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng fulfilled all the basic necesseties; a affluent person has to donate rest of t...
^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...o poorer people or not? I am completely disagree with this statement and shall explore t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...g rest of the money to someone probably be not possible because everyone is earni...
^^
Line 8, column 105, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and richer could only be possible with the collide efforts of both government and wealthy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 241, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'circulate'
Suggestion: circulate
...n proper time to government so it could circulated by the government among the public.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, honestly, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, apart from, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69482288828 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44080556282 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520435967302 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9443219507 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172909601163 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570510255246 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370501223127 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948801767267 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311239276843 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.