The given circular charts highlight the information about the variations occured in per year spending by local authorities in Someland during the years:1980,1990 and 2000. The data is calibrated in per centum.
Overall, it is evident that local authorities spent highest amount on higher education, whereas, least expenditure was on the environmental services and other aspects.
It can be seen that, during the year 1980, higher education comprised of 35% of expenditure, which rose significantly by 10% in the year 1990, and again declined in the year 2000, at 40%. Moreover, K-12 education consisted of 25% of expenses in the year 1990 which was highest in comparison of other two years. Furthermore, transportation accounted for 16% of expenses in the first year, however, in the years 1990 and 2000, 6% and 22% was spent on it respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, unfortunately, less than a fifth amount of expenditure was done on health and human resources during the year 1980, later on, it increased in the second year and then declined to 10%. There was a slight increase in the expenses on environmental services of about a mere 1% to 5% in the year 1990, and other expenses comprised of 6% in the first year after that, it followed a decreasing trend until 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the highest'.
Suggestion: spent the highest
...l, it is evident that local authorities spent highest amount on higher education, whereas, le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...hest amount on higher education, whereas, least expenditure was on the environmental se...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12037037037 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01448264618 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7905101272 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.25 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129071384254 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689622833411 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784216202116 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990372739444 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753854427633 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.