The given linear graph highlights the information about changes in three distinct areas of crime: Burglary, car theft and Robbery in New port city centre between the year 2003 to 2012. The data is calibrated in thousands.
Overall, it is evident that Burglary had highest number of crimes in the starting year, least amount of incidents had happened in the crime area of robbery and large number of incidents happened related to car theft.
It can be seen that in the year 2003, there were nearly 3500 incidents of burglary which reached to the peak with 3700 incidents in 2004 before the drastic decline in it upto the year 2008. Moreover, it followed slight fluctuations until the last year and reached to only 1400 incidents.
Apart from that, car theft was very popular crime in city centre in which about 2500 and 2600 incidences had been occured in the year 2003 and 2005 respectively. Furthermore, it experienced fluctuations from the year 2006 till 2012. It is also possible to see that robbery incidents did not even climbed above 1000 incidents and this figure almost remained stable throughout the given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
... Overall, it is evident that Burglary had highest number of crimes in the starting year, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...st number of crimes in the starting year, least amount of incidents had happened in the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'climb'
Suggestion: climb
...see that robbery incidents did not even climbed above 1000 incidents and this figure al...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02105263158 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49620210134 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6573549531 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134357881311 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611215771216 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079855454389 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096174039747 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835137985026 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.