In the current time of technological advancement; one of the most pressing concerns regarding the given topic asserts that whether it is true that teachers of past were more likely to give information to their students as compared teachers of present time due to the advancement in the sources of information? I am completely disagree with this statement and shall explore tge dimensions and assertions of this time and shape up my opinion by the end.
To begin with, in the past era, there were not much sources of information available to students so the teacher was the only way for them for seeking information regarding any topic. Therefore, it does not mean that now, in the modern period; due to the availability of gadgets, modern teacher has no role in the development of the student. For instance, even a student can acquire knowledge from the internet however, he would not be able to understanding properly the practical operations of that information without the aid of teacher.
Apart from that, Modern teachers are well-educated and heired a well deservable and respectful place in this world. Moreover, modern teachers not only polish the mind of the student by digital method but also let them understand the social and moral values. Furthermore, the modern study is so complex and harder than past so teacher play a greatest role in understanding the student each and every aspect of their studies then, how can it be said that modern teacher has no role to play in the education?
In conclusion, I tend to believe that teacher is like a lamp who always show the path of the students and brighten up the way of their destination. Whatever the source of information is, without the guidance of teacher, nobody can be success in his life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...sources of information? I am completely disagree with this statement and shall explore t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...n with, in the past era, there were not much sources of information available to stu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ex and harder than past so teacher play a greatest role in understanding the stud...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87666666667 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81917245541 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5378870972 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.3 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1 7.06120827912 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294257617366 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118176156431 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651716022177 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174767235972 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568135459707 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.