The given histograms highlight the information about the per week earnings of men and women who belong to the age group (16-59) according to their education level. The data is calibrated in per centum.
Overall, it is evident that men are more likely to be earn as compared to women, either graduates or below-graduates. However, women do not earn even half of the earnings of men.
It can be seen that from the age group of 16 to 19 only below-graduates men have earned. Moreover, among the age group of 20-24, graduates men have earned 220 euros whereas, earning of graduate men who belong to tge category of 25-29 years, earn 170 euros more comparatively, 20-24 age group graduates. Furthermore, graduates of age group (50-59) have the highest per week earning while below-graduates in that group earn 500 euros.
As far as trend is concerned, in regards the earnings of graduates women, the earnings of below-graduates women is less as compared to graduates women who are from the category of 20-24 years age group. Apart from that, weekly earning has been increased in the age group of 25 to 29 years age group with 50 euros. In addition to this, weekly earning of below graduates women till the 50-59 years age group showed a fluctuation trend in their earnings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rnings of below-graduates women is less as compared to graduates women who are fro...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'graduate'.
Suggestion: graduate
...-graduates women is less as compared to graduates women who are from the category of 20-2...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, whereas, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7899543379 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80056498543 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488584474886 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6130581109 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500029063719 0.215688989381 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236583000534 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109840583934 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338932052652 0.15604864568 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836449707523 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.