Some people think that one of the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the drastic increase in environment pollutions is a major concerning area for the globe which leads to so many complications. However, a majority of people deems that the most effective method to tackle this hurdles is that to rise the price of fossil fuels which burn by cars and other vehicles. Furthermore. I strongly disagree with this perception because growing costs of fuels never spreads effects on masses, burden on poor public, use solar energy, car pooling system as well.
The main reason to take opposite side from this notion is that a vast amount of humans never prudently use vehicles in a limit. In addition to this, if the regime will be increasing the amount of fuels for cars and several vehicles than these will not be effecting the people’s desire to expand their own vehicles. Even though, a huge number of masses are expanding these transport without fear of higher cost of fossil fuels. In other words, a gradual incline among fuel rates are burdens on poor conditions families which are not eligible to buy meals for three times. For example, if authorities will be rising the cost of fuels for motors and various transport than it will be perilous for those poverty people who utilise tampons, minibuses, trucks and etcetera for earring their bread and butter.
Moving further, there are another uncountable ways to solve environmental obstacles rather than growing cost of fossil fuels. Likewise, the major is that if people use wind and solar energy as form of fuels in their vehicles than it will assist them to create less pollution. For instance, USA use solar energy in an efficient manners among their vehicles which helps their natives to make little pollution in their atmosphere. On the other hand, car pooling system is not only reducing the environmental issues but also save human’s’ wealth. For example, if a group of colleagues sharing a same car to reach their work destinations than these are beneficial for them to consume money and build up strong relationships.
In conclusion, although, increase rates of fossil fuels for cars and other vehicles are good way to tackle with environment problems but this is not best way. Beside that, there are lots of uncountable manners to solve it. Moreover, even odd number of cars expanding is better formula which steadily successful in Delhi to decrease dramatically level of environment complications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... which burn by cars and other vehicles. Furthermore. I strongly disagree with this percepti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'manner'?
Suggestion: manner
...e, USA use solar energy in an efficient manners among their vehicles which helps their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 146, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the best'.
Suggestion: not the best
...e with environment problems but this is not best way. Beside that, there are lots of unc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09273182957 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73842757055 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3490027374 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263034802802 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863886141337 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644611432039 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169103369989 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238756825802 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.