Some people think that only staff who worked in the company for a long time should be promoted to high position? What is your opinion?
Promotion enhance the confidence for work of every person. Everyone gets high rank when they show their high skills, great work and gain more profit for the company. but few are argue that employees should give high rank during their time in the job. I will discuss my points of views regarding this statement in below paragraphs.
To begin with, workers get the easily high positions due to their skills. They have more skills about any work and show their talent in front of the company. They have no need for work at one position. After that, some staff members show the good performance in the work. So, they get success in the step to step and they will not be wait for long time for promotion. Some people perform very well in particular field. If they will get success in the field so they do more hard work. Thus, it is very good chance to get high position as well as they provide the good profit for the company.
Moving further, if people get high position according the time, so they don't like to do hard work. They have no any competition among the staff members. Employees have no curiosity to get more profit. They will become more lazy and only get the salary from the company. Therefore, staff members get the high position during the time, is not suitable idea. So, company should held the competition and after that check the performance than give the promotion. Because, some people are not able to do work at high position, for instance, they can not handle the company and employees.
In conclusion, company managers should give the promotion to check the ability of any person. Because, it encourage to the employee for doing the more hard work and earn the more money. Similarly, a company also get the more name and fame in the society
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-21 | PreetDhaliwal | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'enhances'.
Suggestion: enhances
Promotion enhance the confidence for work of every person...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...k and gain more profit for the company. but few are argue that employees should giv...
^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...ore profit for the company. but few are argue that employees should give high rank du...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore skills about any work and show their talent in front of the company. They hav...
^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...gh position according the time, so they dont like to do hard work. They have no any ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ey dont like to do hard work. They have no any competition among the staff members...
^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
... the ability of any person. Because, it encourage to the employee for doing the more hard...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61904761905 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22160082015 2.80592935109 79% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460317460317 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1326487449 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.1363636364 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3181818182 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282651956029 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930767946736 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568124492 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187016297044 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412177670841 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 13.0946893788 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.92 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.