Some people think parents should read or tell stories to children. Others think parents needn't do that as children can read books or watch TV, movies by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some people believe that parents should spend times telling stories to children, others think children can read books or watch TV by themselves. Personally, I believe the storytelling of parents still plays an important role in children's development.
On the one hand, it is reasonable to believe that children nowadays do not need the storytelling of their parents. This is because technology has offered a variety of ways for young children to be entertained. For instance, there are many cartoon channels available on TV that broadcast throughout the day, and the contents of these channels are often funny and entertaining that they usually catch children's interest. Further, as most of the youngsters learn to read at an early age, they should be able to read books independently, without the help for their parents. Reading alone, young people may develop reading habits, which can have large impacts on their future development. Also, reading books or watching movies alone, children can become more independent and more mature than their peers.
However, I side with those who think children still need parents' storytelling for several reasons. Firstly, although they learned to read very early, youngsters have not yet developed full cognitive abilities, so that it may be hard for them to understand all the contents of books. Therefore, they still need the help of their parents. Secondly, some of the contents on TV are violent that they are not suitable for children. The innocent mind of children may be corrupted if they are exposed to the adult contents on TV. As a result, parents should spend times to keep an eye on their children.
In conclusion, although youngsters can read books or watch TV by themselves, I believe that they still need the stories told by parents to be fully grown.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ed the help of their parents. Secondly, some of the contents on TV are violent that they a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. Secondly, some of the contents on TV are violent that they are not suitable f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09364548495 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7181686565 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518394648829 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3128873797 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.533333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37005516337 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139629018231 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13396984583 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278643936162 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118077685438 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.