Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is one point of view that parents should teach their children to become good citizens. Meanwhile, other people believe school is the better place for children to be trained to become good citizens. However, in my opinion, parents or schools alone cannot provide holistic education for children. Following this is a more detailed discussion of each point of view and my opinion.
Those claiming that the responsibility to educate children to become good members of society explain the reason is because parents have the most influence on their children. It is parents who train their kids proper behaviors and desirable qualities, such as polite communication and kindness to others, even before they go to kindergarten. In addition, children tend to inactively observe the way the parents conduct their lifestyle, and the thinking process of their parents by being exposed to them everyday. Furthermore, the law requires parents to have the ultimate right and responsibility to take care of their children before they reach the age of 18.
On the other hand, other people that schools have much better conditions for students to learn how to be good citizens. Firstly, education in school is supported with extensive research on the development of a child. Thus, children are educated more holistically with various subjects reflecting different qualities desired by children's future society. They are taught by professional teachers who are trained to educate kids in the best way. Moreover, schools are smaller versions of real society, where children's interactions with other students and teachers are controlled. This environment could provide an opportunity for children to develop social skills and learn social norms.
However, in my opinion, a combination of the two approaches could be the best education for children. Though school can provide professional education, which many parents cannot deliver to their kids by themselves, parents continuously follow and observe the personal development of each child. Thus, they may have more understanding about their children and have more chances to continuously encourage their children to fix weaknesses, improve strengths and discover their talents. However, personal attachment to their children tends to make their education for their kids subjective. For instance, many parents spoil their kids by satisfying most of their desires. Thus, the children get familiar with having what they want and become annoyed easily whenever others do not satisfy their demand. Therefore, the objectivity and formal education are what school can compensate for children's education.
In short, it is necessary for a child to receive education from both their parents and school. While parents have the most impacts on children's characteristics and ultimate legal responsibilities to take care of them, they may be not objective enough in the education for their own kids. Meanwhile, school can provide formal and scientific education for children to meet the needs of future society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...d members of society explain the reason is because parents have the most influence on thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... their parents by being exposed to them everyday. Furthermore, the law requires parents ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p social skills and learn social norms. However, in my opinion, a combination of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in short, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2577.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 470.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4829787234 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85846055432 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470212765957 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7776456821 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.79166666667 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262028285909 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924382482176 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695906204976 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177336300321 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913209681421 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.