Some people think that the purpose of TV news programs is to entertain viewers. Others believe that news programs should be educational and informative. What do you think the purpose of TV news programs is? Support your opinion with reasons and examples.
TV shows and news have different agendas, as it is produced by various stakeholders depending on the channel or the station. With noting that, it would be much appreciated if they were educational; however, most of them are for-profit by entertaining people to entice them to watch the shows. In this piece of writing, several reasons will be communicated for the purpose of conveying the inclination towards the goal of news shows, as it is money-oriented.
First, most TV news squeezes advertising materials in the middle of the show because they need to gain money. MBC news, for instance, has been practicing what they call getting viewers' attention using exciting news stories. However, they cut it, then show ads, which take longer than the whole story. This is done multiple times a day until they finished what they need to explain. Keep in mind that this strategy makes the wallet havier.
Second, news programs are biased towards their sponsors. Unsurprisingly, this is obvious since hiding specific stories because of the fear of losing sponsors. When people watch the ABC news channel, the main aim is to crystalize news for the sake of preparing customers, so-called audience, for the upcoming ad. Consequently, this is really a shame because if they did not hide the news, it would be a more trustable news station and would not have to maneuver to get money with news stories as a veneer. Thus, not a TV program is entirely honest when displaying a story.
In conclusion, people need to pay more attention to what is being watched on TV. News, or other TV shows, should be scrutinized before spend time on them, as most news programs aim to get profit out of manipulated viewers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, really, second, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89619377163 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71475284758 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581314878893 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0922795771 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321160084273 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109111220167 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077625166394 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212188857879 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713684519174 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.