Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap
between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give
opinions.
It is true that technology plays an important role in our life. While many people argue that technology development expands the gap between the rich and the poor, I believe that technology makes a contribution to bring equality to every member of society.
On the one hand, the technology could increase the gap between the wealth and the poverty. Firstly, poor people cannot afford to acquire the latest technology products which could be beneficial for them to improve their financial condition. For example, some developing country invent modern rice harvesters which can help farmer harvest more convenience and effectively due to the amount of time and labor saved; but, poor people do not have enough money to own them. Secondly, some modern methods are applied in term of healthcare which could help people treat fatal disease; however, the cost of treatment is increasingly high which is only affordable for the wealthy. So, poor people have to live together with their disease because of poverty.
On the other hand, technology advancement could make a difference for poor people. The internet is spreading to all parts of the world; this provides a lot of useful information for people from the different economic background. For instance, students who live in a poverty area are likely to gain knowledge from the best educational institution. So, they have the best updated knowledge as much as their counterpart in any nation. In addition, people can buy some technology devices with the lower cost and the function as same as costly devices of reputed brand. Those products help poor people have the opportunity to learn and apply useful knowledge on the internet in their life, which could not be done in the past.
In conclusion, although the range of technology available could increase the gap between poor people and rich people, it seems to me that technological progress can help the poor and the richk become more equality .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-02 | Hoanghcmut98 | 73 | view |
- Many people are optimistic of the 21st century and see it as an opportunity to makepositive changes to the world. To what extent do you share their optimism? What changeswould you like to see in the new century? 61
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries. What are the causes of this? What solutions can be offered? 73
- The Internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before. What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solution can you suggest? 73
- Nowadays, some universities offer graduate students skills that assist to findemployment, but some people believe the main function of a university should be toaccess knowledge for its sake. What’s your opinion? 67
- Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gapbetween the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and giveopinions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... poor and the richk become more equality .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08722741433 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65432041086 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1509690429 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259015457339 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929981406371 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058962344123 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180252634893 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447353874528 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.