Education is the most powerful weapon that can individuals use to change their life. The question is that it is believed by masses the students should choose by schools according to their academic capacity, while others think that it is better to have children who have different qualities studying together. I will discuss both views and my opinion in subsequent paragraphs.
To embark with, why education institute select undergraduate according to their academic capacity and the first and foremost reason is intelligent children can loss their interest in study. To make it more clear, some children will require more time to learn things and that will be a loss of time for other students who already konw about this topic. For instance, mentors teach their students who are not able to understand topic easily and it might be take lot of time. Hence, pupils should be seperate into different classes according to their qualities.
On the other hand, there are numerous reason that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together and the major one is children can increase their knowledge. In other words, every student have different qualitites and if they share their views on any topic with others, therefore they can easily learn new things. For example, a survey was conducted in USA and their authority observed that 90% children boost their knowledge because they discuss ideas to other students in classroom. As a result, it is better for students to studying together.
In conclusion, according to me, studying together is benefical for childrens because they gain more knowledge about any topic, so students should be mentally strong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...st powerful weapon that can individuals use to change their life. The question is t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1684981685 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5704474089 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534798534799 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3555146882 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415856540463 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157038880325 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101316225253 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253389802219 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1085560109 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.