Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, due to an exponential increase in traffic accident rate, it is argued that the issue could be tackled by implementing retributions while the opponents think other methods would put an end to this matter. In this essay, I will be looking closely at both sides and try to draw some conclusions.
On the one hand, it is an indisputable fact that heavy penalties have some positive effects on road safety improvement. First, severe punishments for driving offences have worked as a deterrent against road accidents for many years. There are various types of driving retributions, such as fines, licence suspension and imprisonment, which help prevent people from repeating the same crime. For instance, if a person breaks the traffic laws, he/she will have to pay a fine equal to his/her entire wages. Additionally, the amount of money getting from driving offenders can greatly contribute to national budget. The government may invest this money in road infrastructures, which is necessary for ensuring traffic safety.
On the other hand, safe driving can be promoted by several ways that do not cry out for harsh punishments. Firstly, various programs via different means of media about consequences of traffic accidents may probably raise public awareness about their detrimental impacts. Any pedestrians or travelers can be involved in those situations and suffer from injury or death, causing both spritual and physical loss for the patients’ family and the community. Hence, it is essential that people acknowledge properly the issue. Moreover, local councils can minimize road accidents by setting more difficult driving tests to ensure only experienced people to use their vehicles for transportation, while the government can invest in better public transport to reduce the number of personal vehicles.
By way of conclusion, I believe there is no absolute measure to deal with the matter whether severe punishments or other methods since they tackle the issue in various angles. All in all, the combination of the two measures would bring about positive results.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36778115502 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90696710934 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632218844985 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5131967109 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.733333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261494085683 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757799998621 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365642185029 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137579893831 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268226983903 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.