Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In current day, there are many individuals who argue that children should spend their time to study food and how to prepare it while others believe that student’s time must be utilized to learn crucial subjects. In this essay I am going to discuss both point of view and explain why I am inclined to the former opinion.
There are some culprits why people believe that learning the science of food is essential. Initially, it can enhance student’s interest in education. This is because after a long time of study stressfully, they have a chance to stay away from the figure and words to immerse themselves into a real life. Without thinking hard, student can let off steam and consequently, they are more keen on study. Secondly, the social skills also be improved after this educational policy. As a result, children are able to identify the poisonous food and have healthy meals.
However, others believe that spending time to study core subjects is more crucial. People often have this opinion because the education systems now attach exaggerated important to student’s transcript. When they use most of their time to study , they can get a high mark which opens up the opportunities to be enrolled in famous universities. Another point is that letting children to practice in reality can lead to some accidents. For example, when student plant trees, they get access to many bacteria in the soil and easy to have a stomachache.
In conclusion, I believe that both point of view have their merits, however, I am prone to the view that studying science of food and the way to make it is necessary. This is because it makes student front of learning and also provide them a social skills which is important in daily life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hen they use most of their time to study , they can get a high mark which opens up...
^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...learning and also provide them a social skills which is important in daily life.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83838383838 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61802824443 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9150642068 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326488688394 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093071599722 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066870040264 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192542357553 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574459326798 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.