Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that history is a valuable source of information.
Regardless of beneficial impacts derived from historical knowledge, a group of individuals argue that learning history could not be applicable to people’s today life in various aspects. Though history learning is able to reap an array of downsides, I hold a belief that cultivating past lessons and events would be far more significant in the well-beings of the development of human.
On the one hand, there are some rationales to explain why teaching the history subject is not likely to bring a multitude of useful knowledge about today’s life. First of all, almost historical lessons have a tendency to require learners spending a length of time to get a deeper understanding. In fact, in the modern era, a number of people compulsorily taking their time to learn other subjects or skills that could be more essential and appropriate in their lives, thus carving the time of schedule to deeply accumulate the historical lessons are impossible.
Another fact is that bygone lessons seem to bring no relevant values to the present or the near future. In other words, past lessons mostly did not have enormous influences on the way of people’s lives and the efficiency of solving their crippling problems nowadays.
On the other hands, though the drawbacks of learning history are indispensable, I comply with the idea that accumulating historical information would bring forward beneficial ramifications. First and foremost, the role of history could teach people about past mistakes, advocating the present generations recognize and take precautions to prevent the ancestors’ wrongdoings. For instance, World War II extremely caused an amount of damage such as mitigating the financial development of all countries in diverse aspects, spurring a host of social crimes or even the hunger and poverties, especially in related nations. Through these precious mistakes, the young leadership generations could avoid by dealing with problems in harmony solutions to retake these mistakes in the near future. Apart from that, historical information is able to support the development of tourists in many countries. To be more precise, in European countries like Italia or Spain, by utilizing the availability of historical objects and historical events, they could make a number of tourists attractive and provocative in discovering historical knowledge. This not only boosts the revenue of their countries but also widens the valuable knowledge of visitors.
As cited above, while there are a host of disadvantages arisen on learning history, I strongly believe that the benefit of history would be more necessary and remarkable in every aspect of our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ell-beings of the development of human. On the one hand, there are some rational...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 914, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in many countries. To be more precise, in European countries like Italia or Spa...
^^
Line 8, column 35, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...s. As cited above, while there are a host of disadvantages arisen on learning his...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in fact, such as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3995215311 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9977871237 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0274299641 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.466666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8666666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195378387632 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650523999241 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686148444069 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983047683018 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453323305807 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.