Some people think that taxation should be able to keep to a minimum as the money people earn should be theirs to do with as they wish. Others believe that people should pay a significant level of tax in order to support the public services we all depend on.
In your view, what is the fairest way to deal with the issue of taxation?
Nowadays, it is commonly believed that people should pay taxes at a minimum rate since they would like to spend their money on what they want. Whereas, other people think that it should be kept to a proper level to develop public facilities. This essay argues that although people should be able to do with money that they wish, it is better to pay the tax for public purposes.
On the one hand, many people say that the tax should be kept to a minimum. This is because they dedicate their time to work, so they have a right to spend their money to make them happy such as travel and accessories. For example, A survey of Bangkok post revealed that over 70% of Thai citizens became happier when the government reduced the tax level. However, I believe that it can only be a short-term happiness and people should pay more tax for the government.
On the other hand, taxation should be a significant rate depending on our annual income. A slightly higher amount of money collected from tax will allow the government to invest more money on public services as public transportation and health care. In addition, I will be more useful for people in the country. For instance, Germany changes taxation to an appropriate level for rich people and provides a better transportation system. By doing this, it leads to a better life without traffic congestion for Germanises. Moreover, it is a long-term happiness because they do not have to take much time to travel around the cities.
To summarise, although many people insist that they should pay the tax base on their annual income, I still reaffirm that paying a tax significant level allows the government to invest more benefits and provides people with happiness in the long-term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to spend their money on what they want. Whereas, other people think that it should be k...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they have a right to spend their money to make them happy such as travel and ac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76411960133 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5630276464 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498338870432 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4308175545 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514714661639 0.244688304435 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194605483506 0.084324248473 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126620755886 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354589393661 0.151304729494 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119581682475 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.