It is commonly believed that people should pay tax at a minimum rate since they should be able to spend their money on what they prefer. Others argue that taxation should be kept to a proper level to develop public facilities. This essay argues that although people should be able to do with the money as they wish, it is better to pay the tax for public purposes.
On the one hand, many people say that the amount of tax they pay should be kept to a minimum. This is because they dedicate their time to work, so they have a right to spend their money to make them happy like travelling and shopping. A government survey in Nevada revealed that over 70% of their citizens became happier when the authority reduced the tax level. However, I believe that this can only be short-term happiness and people should pay more tax for public amenities they rely on in daily life.
On the other hand, it is argued that taxation should be a significant rate depending on an annual income. A slightly higher amount of money collected from the tax will allow the government to invest more money on public services like public transportation and health care. The developed and modernised utilities will be more useful for people in the country. For instance, Germany changes taxation to an appropriate level for rich people and provides a better transportation system. By doing this, it provides a better life without traffic congestion which is of benefits to everyone. In my opinion, this is the fairest way to collect and deal with taxes that offer longterm happiness with convenience in lives.
To conclude, even though a minimal level of tax allows people to invest the money on what they want in order to relieve stress and be happy, I still affirm that paying a tax significant level is the most appropriate way to support public services and we all will benefit from this in longterm future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7078313253 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47956336968 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487951807229 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.370850545 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548666393859 0.244688304435 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20006312314 0.084324248473 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133625212893 0.0667982634062 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362544795937 0.151304729494 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126134309066 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.