One of the compelling arguments that most people are discussing currently is changing their industries. Some were more inclined toward tasking in the same organisation, while other people prefer to get a new institution or look for new challenges as well. Both viewpoints will be critiqued before reaching a reasonable conclusion.
First of all, there are groups of people who sacrifice their professional life for one corporation only. Loyalty is the main factor that affected these groups to work in a banal company. But in some scenarios, many companies were making an unfair contract to their employees to preventure all of them changing work or focusing on opportunities that other companies offer during work time. Consequently, business workers could not modify their own life.
On the other hand, there are some individuals who believe they are benefited by changing companies. It is undeniable to say that altering companies can provide more experience and knowledge than struggling with the same task every day. It is because folks will be exposed to different working environments which them to gain new perspectives that are beneficial for their profession. This can increase the value of an individual, resulting in receiving good offers with a higher salary.
After analysing both views, I agree with some people with an idea of working for different corporations. Apparently, most of the beneficial experiences you will get while operating in new environments. Thus, I recommend that people should keep themselves motivated for shifting workplaces which can help them enjoy their life and fulfil their expectations.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98625595175 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2026608561 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281894458755 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887889310622 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667584508157 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172144253358 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044298276888 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98625595175 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2026608561 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281894458755 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887889310622 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667584508157 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172144253358 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044298276888 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.