Some people work for the same organisation of working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
One of the interesting arguments that most people are discussing currently is changing their industries. Somebody was more inclined toward tasking in the same organisation. However, Some people prefer to get a new institution or look for new challenges as well. Both of viewpoints will be critiqued before reaching a reasonable conclusion.
First of all, it has some groups of people who sacrifice their professional life for one corporation only. Loyalty is the main factor that affected these groups to working in a banal company. But in some scenarios, many companies were making an unfair contract to their own employees to preventure all of them changing work or focusing on opportunities that other companies will have given during work time. Consequently, business workers could not modify their own life.
On the other hand, there are some individuals who believe they are benefited by changing companies. It is undeniable to say altering companies can get more experiences and knowledge than struggling with the same task everyday Because folks will be exposed to different working environments. Therefore, allowing them to gain new perspectives that are beneficial for the task. This can increase the value of an individual, resulting in receiving good offers with higher salary.
After analysing both of views, I agree with some people who gave an idea to work for different corporations. Apparently, most of the beneficial experiences things you will get while operating in new environments. Thus, I recommended that people should keep themselves motivated for shifting workplaces which can help them enjoy their life and fulfil their expectations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...edge than struggling with the same task everyday Because folks will be exposed to differ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43076923077 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01984560129 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626923076923 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3475566657 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287831010028 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861632254879 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649864122806 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171634831559 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053994880923 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.