The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph breaks down data on visitors of Caribbean island over a period of 7 years. It is unmistakable that there was a reducing trend for total visitors and visitors who staying on cruise ships, despite a slightly climbing figures for visitors who staying on Island.

On the areas of total visitors and visitors who staying on cruise ships, one sees a trend of surge. The pattern was first demonstrated by total visitors, which experience a major increase to 3.5 millions people in 2017, a gains of 2.5 million people. Matters developed in similar way for visitors who staying on cruise ship, as this area had decisively growed to 2 millions people from 2010.

There was a different course of events for numbers of visitors who staying on island because of the fact that these area marginally gained. One sees an increasing trend in a period of 2010-2014 as shown by growth to the 1.5 millions people by 2014. There was a fluctuation in regards to a period of 2015-2017, which totaled a recovery to 1.5 millions people between 2015 and 2017.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rge. The pattern was first demonstrated by total visitors, which experience a ma...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a gain' or simply 'gains'?
Suggestion: a gain; gains
...ncrease to 3.5 millions people in 2017, a gains of 2.5 million people. Matters develop...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...mbers of visitors who staying on island because of the fact that these area marginally gained. One sees...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...ying on island because of the fact that these area marginally gained. One sees an increas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...eople by 2014. There was a fluctuation in regards to a period of 2015-2017, which totaled a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77595628415 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58070486966 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530054644809 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6312766044 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0782334890916 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436277960863 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343013088838 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615330684893 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277948139752 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.