Some people think teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or more interested in. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

Some people think teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or more interested in. To what extent do you agree?

Schooling systems across the globe emphasis on subject learning as part of the curriculum, some people think that a teen should be allowed to choose between all subject learning or only in interested subjects. In Asian school the focus of learning favors on all subject learning, in countries such as India or Sri Lanka. In my opinion, I completely agree that the youngsters (aged 13-19) should learn all subjects. The following paragraphs will elaborate the merits of my position.
Firstly, educational requirement in high schools should cater all subject as it is very critical to overall knowledge gain. Consequently, subjects such as Science, Mathematics, Art, Sports and languages are equally important as base learning for university education. For example, languages learnt in school is a basis for effective communication, a prerequisite for students perusing university education in any varied field (art, life sciences, engineering etc). Hence, all subject learning can prove to be beneficial.
Rounded personality development is a direct result of an individual’s effort in gaining content knowledge in subjects at school levels. Furthermore, when teenagers grow up as responsible citizens, overall capacities enhance their chances for life success. For instance, if a high school student poured all efforts to learning sports only, and didn’t aim at studying maths or language, the success of the individual can be limited to just playing and can’t become an effective sports coach. Thus, knowledge at least to basic high school levels in all subjects is important.
Subject learning for teenagers at school is important and learning all can be advantageous. I think, that the Asian schooling system that focuses on all subject learning has yielded successful students at university and rounded personalities with life success. Today, the academic achievements don’t guarantee great life, but a well-rounded individual has greater chances and hence school across the world should consider basic imparting of knowledge in all subjects.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, well, at least, for example, for instance, i think, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60702875399 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06592762751 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55910543131 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6269319265 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287621624843 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113498137381 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717151439125 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192538006319 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528512661078 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.