Some people think thát the detailed description of crimes on newspapers and TV had bad consequence, so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, a heated debate has been engendered among the majority of people on whether or not detailed descriptions of crimes should be displayed in newspapers. A wide variety of people fear that the trend would have negative outcomes on society. This essay attempts to give plausible reasonings on why such an action should be restricted from the public eye.
To commence with, opponents of publicizing crimes are mostly concerned with the integrity of the information being exposed to dwellers. Particularly, there are high chances of newspapers written with biased views towards people involved in the crime, hence raising a public outcry for flawed equality. This would only put more pressure on the authorities to provide a closer and more objective view of the crimes, a process that is demanding of both time and effort.
Moreover, exposing a crime would do more harm than good to the society. By this, I mean those who are approached by news relating to crimes might get distressed and become unnecessarily wary of their surroundings. In the long run, this action would infiltrate in city dwellers the broad picture of a community full of social misfits and fatal threats. In fact, such crimes are only bleak aspects of a society that needs to be perceived more optimistically.
All in all, the idea of supplying people with detailed descriptions of crimes would do great harm to the society concerning the situation’s authenticity and the dwellers’ outlook on their surroundings. Reporting crimes within trials would assure their privacy and safety from public scruntiny.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...endered among the majority of people on whether or not detailed descriptions of crimes should ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, look, moreover, so, then, well, i mean, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23046875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89604380184 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7074815742 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.583333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195803219261 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706953064952 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433941455637 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120357286423 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394376676261 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.