Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion

The modern life brings much noise which is one of the issues which affects of quality of people’s life. Some people are of the opinion that the noise should be managed strictly by the Government, whereas other people claim that they don’t mind to any level of noise in their places. In this essay, these viewpoints surrounding this matter shall be examined in detail.
Those who support the idea that the Government should have some strict controls about noise believe that it creates some following benefits. The first advantage is protecting people’s hearing. According to a recent study, people who hear sounds more than 70dB for 2 hours every day will face the risk of deafness. The second one is the act of decreasing noise is the best way to save energy. The reason is that the louder sound was heard, the more electrical power was used. However, the fact has shown that it is difficult to deal with managing noise because of the lack of residents’ awareness.
Those who disagree with the mentioned – above idea think that noise does not influent anyone for some following reasons. One of the clear reasons is that the Government has not to spend much more money on strict law about managing noise. In fact, there are plenty of issues must be done for citizens such as enhancing healthcare systems, building schools and streets, etc. Another one is that people think they have the right to make as much noise as they can. A typical example is that all massive celebrations are usually held in wide places and they always want to turn on the biggest level of sound to have a good time together.
In a nutshell, noise does more harm than good, I am convinced that controlling the level of noise plays an essential role in people’s lives. The Government should have some strict policies to manage the effects of noise.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'turned'.
Suggestion: turned
... held in a wide place and they are also turn on the biggest sound as much as they ha...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, whereas, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79012345679 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45085827717 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7867579074 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445448831064 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140515350662 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146148794125 0.0667982634062 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285840414038 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144302847855 0.056905535591 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.