Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, humans are more likely to take care of wild animals and birds by means of giving too much attention and resources. I, personally, concur with this mindset due to the value and importance of wildlife.
To begin with, animals in general and wild animals play a pivotal role in people's society. First, they contribute to the huge biodiversity with a wide range of species which provide numerous materials for scientists in the way to protect endangered animals by breeding in laboratories. In addition, the myriad of wild animals is able to do a favor for the human ecosystem which can sustain the balance on the planet. Should animals vanish, the ecosystem and people cannot find any resources to maintain their lives.
Admittedly, a large number of wild animals are on the brink of extinction so governments and individuals should take action to protect them. These days, the figure of disappeared animals has been documented soared astonishingly. Humans realize this problem and they raise awareness to preserve the remaining wild animals and birds by keeping some of them in the zoo and giving them special carings or finding some new methods to protect them in nature. Take the red bears, a rare animal in Vietnam, they are kept in the National Park and fed with specialized food.
To sum up, from my perspective, protecting wild animals is a must action because of their significant functions, therefore, humans should pay attention to these animals, especially rare animals by devoting resources and habitants to retain human lives,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...to maintain their lives. Admittedly, a large number of wild animals are on the brink of extinc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, in addition, in general, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11196911197 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72907704921 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57528957529 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2042039362 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270102456155 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976403916016 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637030414222 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156685510717 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196327578658 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.