Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that too much revenue has been spent paying attention and repairing old buildings, so people should knock down old buildings for the new ones instead. From my point of view, i mostly disagree with this notion because of its drawbacks for the society. Tthe following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the industrialized world and with the appearence of modern technology that numerous traditional value have been forgot, so old building is hugely significant for the population life. Not only can various valuable knowledge, historically information be passed down, which improve the mentality life of adolesence, but also creative and imagination abilities can be created of teenation, advanced the economic backgroud of their country. Furthermore, socioeconomic problem will be narrowed gradually with the connection of traditional communities which increase the nation's improvement. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Rock Holding, the famous interviewer and professor, which is expert about the success of european nations where have preverved conserved their cutural value. The statictic demonstrated that nearly every countries has got plenty of achievement.
However, we can not negate the weakness of this phenomenon for the society. Reducing dramatically the oppotunities of postgraduates to appoarch with modern value which can change their mindset. Moveover, many government take advantage from this investment for their own profits, harmful influence will be led by this action to the young generation.
To conclude, though my agrument from the essay, i totally disagree with this statement since it have a lot of positive aspect for people. The state need to have clear plans to improve their citizens for the development of their nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the industrialized worl...
^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'forgotten'.
Suggestion: forgotten
...at numerous traditional value have been forgot, so old building is hugely significant ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ditional communities which increase the nations improvement. To illustrate, there was a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries has got plenty of achievement. However, we can not negate the weakness ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this action to the young generation. To conclude, though my agrument from the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51811594203 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9641556566 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7321870855 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162368418862 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581863200038 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129323048015 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10717846375 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122314421622 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.