It is often argued that universities should be practical for pupils to suit themselves on the working environment whereas others believe that the true significance should afford a deep knowledge basis for graduates. In my view, universities may maintain both knowledge between practical and academic.
To begin with, a purely academic learning environment is possible to damage the future of graduates. While the academic level must be certainly higher than learning in a practical environment, these species of student may not adapt to a new atmosphere in the future as soon as they are graduated. For instance, the known example was a Hong Kong master who cannot found the favored work since his interview performance was poor as a kid. Finally, he was being unemployed from his self-respect. Since they will tend to apply high-level job opportunities by their high academic qualification, universities should prepare a part of course or even create an internship to strengthen their working performance.
On the other hand, practical learning is available to prompt a total development for the graduates. As far as the atmosphere of universities is same as a workplace, such as provide a competitive campus, graduates would absorb the working environment early as well as understand that what they lack to their work requirement at the moment. So, graduates are able to pursue a full self-learning, to fulfill the acquirement of their dream during their studying period.
In conclusion, because of the purpose of providing a practical campus is let graduates know their work prospection as well as it will not hurt the knowledge of academic level seriously, I strongly believe that the advantages of establishing a practical environment of universities absolutely outweigh the disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, so, then, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37455830389 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23670282498 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572438162544 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2143562538 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.272727273 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0909090909 7.06120827912 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188484897963 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695319977054 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638922606211 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127386044925 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720333666788 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.