Some people want government to spend money on finding life on other planets, however, others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems.
Discuss both views and give you own opinion.
How the government should allocate the budget is always a matter of debate. While alien life searching is favoured by many advocators, the opponents argue that such a waste is unacceptable. In my opinion, although alien projects are costly, the government should not cease seeking, whereas budget control is necessary.
Admittedly, space technology advances human society in the long term. This can be seen from the by-products from space research which started from 1960s. The outcomes, including satellite telecommunication, microwave oven, and computer, significantly improved people’s efficiency and productivity. If the government continue to support space research, the benefit may not reveal straight after, but it is very likely to happen in the near future.
On the other hand, it is also understandable why people are against for exploring life on other planets since there are too many issues on earth waiting to be addressed. For the government, the prime duty should be to protect its people away from sickness, poverty and crime. Thus, instead of looking for unknown life forms in the universe, it would be more realistic and contributive to establish more hospitals, build more schools and train more healthcare workers to help its people. Moreover, as there are many species on earth are endangered, investing huge amount of money in searching alien lives just seems hypocritical.
It seems to me that both arguments are justified, and it is also unwise to support one side. I think a better solution is to control the budget that is going to be used in finding lives in space strictly so that the public’s money would not be wasted.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, i think, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2276119403 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94985519805 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608208955224 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1279020223 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180247871505 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539392540623 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529613005871 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948880164605 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450729739873 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.