Many people prefer change in life. Therefor most of them frequently change their workplace for getting better facilities. There are some persons who don’t want to change their workplace because of their loyalty. From my point of view a versatile work life is full of possibilities.
Carrier development is a common target for almost every person. Nowadays carrier development requires dynamic experiences and this is possible if a person try for new kinds of jobs. Staying in one company and doing the same job again and again do not bring dynamic experience. To get wide range of experience a person have to switch jobs and work environment frequently. Very few companies can provides this type of facility. On the other hand, switching organization also brings better facility, for instance higher salaries and new challenges. It also make a person confident and increase the ability to tackle any unwanted situation.
Some people believe that doing job for same company is risk free. A person completing his or her work life for the same company, can enjoy the sense of family environment in the workplace too. At the same time loyal employees are also good for a company. This is because company can develop trust which creates possibilities for promotion. Some people also believe that those who switch to new organization might face difficulties to adjust with new environment. Sometimes they feel unsecured for their job. There for it is not good for those who don’t like challenges.
To conclude, it can be said that, experience brings information which increases knowledge. The more challenges in work life the better the carrier will be. In order to get those challenges, I think it is good to switch work place frequently.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...er salaries and new challenges. It also make a person confident and increase the abi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09407665505 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77018166289 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9828058786 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.619047619 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280987295336 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087653033306 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561327156163 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179573413069 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514679602772 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...er salaries and new challenges. It also make a person confident and increase the abi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09407665505 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77018166289 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9828058786 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.619047619 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280987295336 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087653033306 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561327156163 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179573413069 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514679602772 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.