Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should beraised considerably.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The more developed the world are, the more demand for workers increased. It is hard to think about whether to keep senior or to let junior in. There is a risen controversy recently debating about whether to extend the working age or not. To some extend I agree with this statement.
Apparently, the more working time is, the more competent the employees are. Obviously all company or organization prefer skillful staffs in order to save up training expenditures as well as to maximize working efficiencies. In history, many experienced veterans out of working ages were still being kept as to continue their tasks or to become expertises. Thereby, it is understandable to scrutinize labour age extension.
Apart from that, being old is a big drawback. There are so many people when reaching certain ages lose their dedicating enthusiasm. As one ages, his/her health sequently goes down, which effects strongly on the work’s result. Furthermore, some elderlies grow many obsolete prejudices and standards which are hard to change and not suitable for current working paces of today’s flexible environment.
On the other hand, younger staffs and newcomers are mostly full of energy and dedication. They are always deserve new knowledge and apply into work rapidly. However some company or organization hesitate to take in new employees because they are full of senior. It is sometimes unfair to give their chances for other elderlies, as I mention above – veterans are not always the best choice.
From these perspective, the government should seriously think of the employment’s age limitation. It is true that some of seniors are extremely necessary for the national development; still, the juniors needs opportunities to give out their potential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
... extend the working age or not. To some extend I agree with this statement. Apparentl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... elderlies grow many obsolete prejudices and standards which are hard to change a...
^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deserved'.
Suggestion: deserved
... energy and dedication. They are always deserve new knowledge and apply into work rapid...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... knowledge and apply into work rapidly. However some company or organization hesitate t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 6, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this perspective' or 'these perspectives'?
Suggestion: this perspective; these perspectives
... are not always the best choice. From these perspective, the government should seriously think ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the seniors') or simply say ''some seniors''.
Suggestion: some of the seniors; some seniors
...'s age limitation. It is true that some of seniors are extremely necessary for the nationa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, however, so, still, thus, well, apart from, as to, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3024911032 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97018530306 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.631633095 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7777777778 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173800819768 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048314364792 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380820021061 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871196428869 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414972310578 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.