Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to the university, in order to travel or to work. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages ?
Over the past decades, it is noticeable that there is a tendency for students who are about to attend to university to take a gap year so that they can have time to travel or to work. While this tendency has several benefits, I hold an opinion that they could never overshadow the drawbacks for the following reasons.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that there are some disadvantages of taking one year off. Firstly, students can lose their interest in studying, many science research have pointed out that students who take a year off usually struggle with the academic environment when they come back after a time traveling or working. This can be a result from a cushy time and easy lifestyle without any pressure come from exams, tests or assignments. Furthermore, obeying rules and laws in university, meeting the deadlines and facing with oral tests, presentations are very challenging and painful. Secondly, managers and bosses can see these gap years just like a long vacation. These days, gap year is gaining popularity for itself. As a result, many managers can derive the advantages from it, especially when it relates to social activities, volunteer work or non-governmental organizations. But, many people fail in attempt to achieve some crucial achievements or cannot convey those precious experience. This can be prone to be suspected of professionalism, consistency and attentiveness.
On the other hand, notwithstanding above-mentioned drawbacks, I would argue that it will be a grave mistake to overlook some potential benefits of the value coming from gap year. One main advantage is travel, and this can actually help students. While the blue collar economy is transferring into white collar one, so that, fresh graduate is expected to have multi vital abilities, unfortunately, work-life is not able to communicate by all the theories or lectures they get from university. A gap year travel can be a perfect time for them to indulge in many different cultures rub in a majority of living conditions. Consequently, through those steps they can sharpen their skills and this can be constructive for their future. For example, traveling abroad in order to have a chance to see other cultures and this is an ideal way to collect valuable skills like time managing, adaptability, problem solving and so on. Moreover, another benefit that should be taken into account is that taking jobs in the initial time just like putting a first brick. Later on this can play a huge role when deciding their major. Statistics have showed that more than 36% of students wish they could choose a different major, this can be seen that students at that time are not able to draw a line between what they like and what they actually good at, from that impulsive decision will be made. In order to handle that situation, psychologist advice students to take some volunteer programs in order to discover themselves, their strengths and maybe their talents or inborn merits so that they can have a comprehensive understanding and see the desires of their lives. Eventually, seek for a unique university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1086, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onalism, consistency and attentiveness. On the other hand, notwithstanding above...
^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e a perfect time for them to indulge in many different cultures rub in a majority of living co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 515.0 315.596192385 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02912621359 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92188429977 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539805825243 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0938808162 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.727272727 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4090909091 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180347766928 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595938308071 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767185725275 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135467045939 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023724119805 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.