Some think that private companies should pay for pollution clean up, while others say it should be a government’s responsibility. Discuss and state your own view.
Contamination is getting into the nerves of people nowadays. Presently, it is essential for private organisations to give monetary endorsements for the clean up of contamination. By contrast, others claim that it must be done by legal authority. Here, i would like to account for both the sides with my own perception.
Plathora points can be mentioned to shore up former view. First and foremost, private industries and companies are throwing there waste into water and land and it pollutes the environment. To illustrate, in various countries liter is thrown into oceans and seas in order to destroy them and it makes water polluted. Needless to say, it is necessary for private companies to pay for these activities, as they contibutes remarkably to pullute the environment. Moreover, numerous companies also polluting the air through the smoke they produce. Thus, companies should give monetary endorsements for these acts.
Ample points can be mentioned to endorse the latter view. Initially, legal authority imposes so many taxes on private companies. To be specific, administratives are already taking money in gigantic quantity from every company and it can be used further for cleaning up the contamination. Consequently, the idea to take money from private companies does not fully holds the water. What is more, some private company’s waste is not detrimental for the environment and therefore they do not show any interest to pay for pollution clean up. Thence, the idea to charge money from private companies is good for nothing.
To recapitulate, both the aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, legal authorities are imposing tax on private companies. However, it is the supreme responsibility of everyone to make their contribution in the clean up of contamination. So it is advisable, private industries need to give monetary support for these indispensable activities to stay healthy and to make our ambience healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... must be done by legal authority. Here, i would like to account for both the side...
^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...y from private companies does not fully holds the water. What is more, some private c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36156351792 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15974679844 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.156984111 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.35 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336190023111 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914900002126 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644798223264 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1899356816 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650926327899 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.