Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Outline:
It is argued by some that online teaching is now offered at some universities so leaners can be available to study on the Internet. While there are several drawbacks, this trend has far more benefits.
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks of being taught through the Internet relating to interaction between teachers and students and undeveloped soft skills. First of all, teaching on the Internet leads to the lack of discussion between lecturers and students. To be specific, teachers and learners do not have an opportunity to have face-to-face communication, which is really helpful for presentation skill. Furthermore, another soft skills such as leadership skill, working in group. To be clearly, traditional learning helps students studying with each other; as a result, leaders in groups can enhance their leadership skills while others can practice how to work in group.
On the other hand, online teaching brings many advantages namely saving time and reducing manifold expenses. Firstly, both lecturers and students can decrease time for transportation from home to school and vice versa. In stead of spending time on school, they can do other works or learning other subjects simultaneously and conveniently. Secondly, traditional learning requires a big tidy room with full of electronic lights and modern educational facilities. To serve all that requirements, a great amount of money needs to be spent daily. However, learning on the Internet from home can be a solution for that problem.
In conclusion, learning indirectly online has many adverse effects such as cannot have discussion and develop soft skills, yet the benefits namely time and money saving outweigh the drawbacks of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acks, this trend has far more benefits. On the one hand, there are some drawback...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
...ion from home to school and vice versa. In stead of spending time on school, they can do ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome can be a solution for that problem. In conclusion, learning indirectly onlin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9139558243 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8315329909 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190627145107 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641721689585 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100774508007 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141017157449 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12826627667 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.